Tackling the Affordable Housing Crisis


DISCLAIMER: As the COVID-19 public health situation evolves, new regulations are being continually issued. This page/story/information may not include the most recent information.

New joint venture aims to raise $1 billion for affordable housing.

By Kimberly Latimer-Nelligan, Andrea R. Ponsor, and Lori Little

As a nation, we are facing crisis after crisis. More than 200,000 Americans have died from the coronavirus—a number that grows steadily each day. Tens of millions of people have lost jobs, and many businesses are shutting their doors. At the same time, recent incidents of police brutality against Black and Brown individuals have put a needed spotlight on the systemic racism that has plagued our society for too long.

Kimberly Latimer-Nelligan
Kimberly Latimer-Nelligan

Each of these issues—health, poverty, and racial inequity—all intersect at yet another emergency that families are reckoning with nationwide: a widespread shortage of affordable housing.

Right now, Americans all over the country are struggling to pay their rent, with up to 23 million people at risk of eviction. Policy responses to the pandemic—including moratoria on evictions, rent and mortgage forbearance, CARES Act stimulus payments, and federal unemployment insurance—have failed to provide long-lasting solutions, virtually ensuring that the public health crisis will lead to massive displacement and homelessness. All of this disproportionately impacts communities of color, who have been at the mercy of predatory lending and other long-standing systems that reinforce and perpetuate racial inequities.

Even before the pandemic, the research was clear that having access to safe, quality, affordable housing is one of the most powerful social determinants of health. Now, public health is not only threatened by COVID-19, but by the recession that is sure to follow, which in the past prompted private equity to gobble up distressed real estate assets at bargain prices, dramatically increasing rents and deepening the inequities in our nation’s housing system. It is urgent to combat this momentum by preserving and building new affordable housing so this does not happen again.

Andrea Ponsor
Andrea Ponsor

Our three nonprofit organizations—Low Income Investment Fund (LIIF), Stewards of Affordable Housing for the Future (SAHF), and National Affordable Housing Trust (NAHT)—have come together to do just that. We announced a joint venture today that aims to raise $1 billion within the first five years to build, protect, and preserve approximately 10,000 affordable homes across the country. We know this is only the tip of the iceberg, but it’s a start. And we’re not going to do it in a bubble.

We will leverage the financial instruments of the affordable housing industry to support responsible and just development guided by a commitment to lifting up resident voices and responding to their complex needs—because we understand that housing is so much more than a physical place to live. To truly help families, we need to better understand the issues they face. We will listen to residents about not just what they need to survive, but about what they need to thrive, including child care, education, and public transportation.

Lori Little
Lori Little

Efforts by organizations in this sector to grow and expand have historically been driven entirely by economics. Our transaction supports the long-term sustainability and growth of a mission-first syndicator.

Even before our formal partnership, our three organizations have come together on several initiatives, including the Fund to Preserve Affordable Communities (FPAC), a $100 million collaborative between LIIF, NAHT, and others, that provides acquisition financing to SAHF members. Through FPAC, a $3.3 million acquisition loan was made to The NHP Foundation to preserve the long-term affordability of 120 affordable homes on Maryland’s Eastern Shore.

LIIF also provided a range of innovative financing for BRIDGE Housing, a SAHF member and leading-edge developer with a deep, resident-driven approach. This included a $7.5 million loan through FPAC to develop the Monte Vista project in Milpitas, California, consisting of 306 affordable and market-rate apartments, children’s play areas, and a new light-rail stop. For this project, we provided access to flexible acquisition capital to prevent resident displacement, enterprise level capital to support comprehensive redevelopment, and technical assistance to support an on-site child care operator.

Together, we plan to forge new partnerships, such as the $100 million Health & Housing Fund with UnitedHealth Group announced this summer by SAHF and NAHT, to build more than 1,000 new homes for low-income renters over the next two years.

Our new joint venture will scale and expand more projects like these, with a specific focus on supporting the development, preservation, and operation of affordable rental homes serving communities of color.

The time is now to be bold, challenge paradigms, and shift the systemic racism in our housing systems. Existing solutions to the current crisis will not suffice. We need a new model. We must challenge the status quo and shift the power and focus of capital to provide safe, quality, and affordable housing. This will not be an easy or quick process. Long-standing approaches, policies, and systems must be reimagined and strategically rebuilt.

We recognize that we are only three nonprofit organizations in a massive field of affordable housing development, but we hope our new approach influences other organizations to join us on this journey, giving those with shared values who are considering joining forces the courage to make it happen.

Together, we will serve as a nimble alliance, offering a highly coordinated source of both debt and equity that advances equitable outcomes. We will bring together best practices to inform creative financial solutions that champion resident-centric approaches and partnerships. We are in it for the long haul, and we’re dedicated not only to trying to tackle today’s urgent housing needs, but to building more vibrant, robust, and equitable communities in the process.


Kimberly Latimer-Nelligan, Andrea R. Ponsor, and Lori Little

Kimberly Latimer-Nelligan is president of the Low Income Investment Fund. Beekman Advisors represented Low Income Investment Fund in the due diligence and negotiation of the recent transaction. Andrea R. Ponsor is president and CEO of Stewards of Affordable Housing for the Future. Lori Little is president and CEO of National Affordable Housing Trust.


Michigan license number:   DM-0016282 Available to the public and licensed in Michigan.

Section 13(1)  When a licensee establishes a debt management plan for a debtor, the licensee may charge and receive an initial fee of $50.00

Section 13(2)  A licensee shall attempt to obtain consent to participate in a debt management plan from at least 51%, in number or dollar amount, of the debtor’s creditors within 90 days after establishing the debt management plan. If the required consent is not actually received by the licensee, the licensee shall provide notice to the debtor of the lack of required consent and the debtor may, at its option, close the account. If the debtor decides to close the account, any unexpended funds shall be returned to the debtor or disbursed as directed by the debtor.

Sec. 14. (1) A contract between a licensee and debtor shall include all of the following:

(a) Each creditor to which payments will be made and the amount owed each creditor. A licensee may rely on records of the debtor and other information available to it to determine the amount owed to a creditor.

(b) The total amount of the licensee’s charges.

(c) The beginning and termination dates of the contract.

(d) The principal amount and approximate interest charges of the debtor’s obligations to be paid under the debt management plan.

(e) The name and address of the licensee and of the debtor.

(f) Any other provisions or disclosures that the director determines are necessary for the protection of the debtor and the proper conduct of business by a licensee.

Sec. 18. (1) In addition to the fee described in section 13(1), a licensee may charge a reasonable fee for providing debt management services under a debt management plan. The fee under this subsection shall not exceed 15% of the amount of the debt to be liquidated during the express term of the plan.

(2) A licensee may offer a debtor the option to purchase credit reports or educational materials and products, and charge a fee to the debtor if the debtor elects to purchase any of those items from the licensee.  Fees charged under this subsection are not subject to the 15% limitation on fees described in subsection (1).

(3) Except for a cancellation described in subsection (4), in the event of cancellation of or default in the performance of the contract by the debtor before its successful completion, a licensee may collect $25.00 in addition to any fees and charges of the licensee previously received by the licensee. This $25.00 fee is not subject to the 15% limitation on fees and charges under subsection (1).

(4) A contract is in effect when it is signed by the licensee and the debtor and the debtor has made a payment of any amount to the licensee. The debtor has the right to cancel the contract until 12 midnight of the third business day after the first day the contract is in effect by delivering written notice of cancellation to the licensee. A cancellation described in this section is not subject to, and a licensee shall not collect, the fee described in subsection (3).

(5) If a debtor fails to make a payment of any amount to a licensee within 60 days after the date a payment is due under a contract, the licensee may, in its discretion, cancel the debt management contract if it determines that the plan is no longer suitable for the debtor, the debtor fails to affirmatively communicate to the licensee the debtor’s desire to continue the plan, or the creditors of the debtor refuse to continue accepting payments under the plan.

(6) A licensee shall not contract for, receive, or charge a debtor an amount greater than authorized by this act. A person that violates this subsection, except as the result of an inadvertent clerical or computer error, shall return to the debtor the amount of the payments received from or on behalf of the debtor and not distributed to creditors, and, as a penalty, an amount equal to the amount overcharged.

530 W Allegan Street, 7th Floor
Lansing, MI  48909-7720

Credit Advisor Logo 3

Schedule a Call Back

Credit Advisor Logo 3

Get Help Now!